Classic, Film, Hindi, Review


Raju (Dev Anand), once a successful tourist guide, hesitates to return to his hometown,Udaipur, after his early release from jail. He ends up in a remote village temple wearing a saffron scarf and finds himself suddenly elevated to the position of a holy man. Six months later, Raju’s mother (Leela Chitnis) and Rosie (Waheeda Rehman), a dancer and Raju’s lover, reach the jail to take him home but are told he was let off earlier. Rosie takes Raju’s mother home and relates her side of the story. She was the daughter of a professional temple dancer who, in an attempt to give her a respectable existence, married her off to a middle-aged archeologist, Marco (Kishore Sahu). However, Marco had no time for her and also forced her to leave dancing. On an excavation, they took Raju as their guide and while Marco spent all his time at the excavation site, drinking and whoring, the neglected Rosie tried to commit suicide. She was saved by Raju, who encouraged her to leave Marco and lead a life of her own. Rosie left Marco and and came to live with Raju. Naturally, tongues wagged at their ‘live-in’ relationship and soon Raju was abandoned by all, even his mother. Neglecting his own career, Raju groomed Rosie to become a professional dancer. Soon, Rosie became the toast of the country as ‘Nalini’, but their personal relationship started to deteriorate when he took to drinking and gambling with their new found wealth. When Marco tried to re-enter Rosie’s life, Raju forged Rosie’s signature to keep him away from her. However the forgery was discovered and Raju was arrested. Though she initially misunderstood him, Rosie met him in jail and promised to wait for him. Meanwhile, Raju now has got accustomed to being a holy man, and has helped the village acquire its own school, hospital and postal service. One day, he tells the villagers a story his mother had told him of another holy man who had kept a fast for twelve days to bring rain to a parched land. And then drought hits the village and the villagers beg him to fast for them…

Guide is one of the most remarkable films of Indian Cinema and truly a film that was ahead of its times. Based on RK Narayan’s novel The Guide, the film is immortalized by Director Vijay Anand’s bold, unconventional strokes; who would have dared to show a man and woman living together outside the sanctity of a marriage way back in the 1960s? And that too in a milieu as traditional as that of Hindi cinema, which rarely allows nonconformist relationships even today! In fact, it is one of the earliest efforts in Indian Cinema to actually show its two leading characters as frail human beings who could make mistakes in life, and yet be unapologetic about it. Consequently, Dev Anand, who also produced the film, was advised by all and sundry not to touch this project with a bargepole but it speaks volumes of his conviction towards the subject matter that not only did he get a film made on it but a film that remains one of the landmark films of Indian Cinema.

Guide was made in two versions – an English version in collaboration with Pearl S Buck and directed by Ted Danielewski to introduce Dev Anand to western audiences and, of course, the Hindi version directed by Dev Anand’s younger brother, Vijay Anand. Initially, Vijay was dead against directing this film causing Anand to approach elder brother Chetan Anand, who initially agreed but then got busy with his own production that he was also directing, Haqeeqat (1964). Then Raj Khosla was brought in to helm the film. But things didn’t work out here either. Vijay Anand was approached again and this time he took on the film, albeit reluctantly. Ironic because Guide today is regarded as perhaps the best film that Vijay Anand had made and rightly so.

Guide shows just how well Vijay Anand understood cinematic language and what’s more the psyche of his audiences. It also is a text book study in understanding just how different the two mediums of writing for a novel and making a film are. One can understand just why RK Narayan might not have been too happy with the film, while at the same time, one fully understands why Goldie Saab made the alterations he did. One of the major changes that Vijay Anand did was to change the setting of the film from Malgudi to Udaipur and while this did give the film an exotic, grand visual look, admittedly perhaps this took away from the ambiance of the small town of Narayan’s novel. But then it would be incredulous to accept Dev Anand as a South Indian in a small town with the aroma of idlis and filter coffee. The ending too of the film was significantly different from that of the novel. But then Vijay Anand has always maintained that he was never interested in merely copying any work of art from one medium to another unless there was scope for value addition and to be fair to him, he has made Guide into a rich and unforgettable cinematic experience. The English version, though closer to the novel and in spite of a nude scene using a duplicate instead of Waheeda Rehman, flopped miserably even causing Narayan to write a piece criticising the film but the Hindi version remains a classic to this day.

The film works best as it looks at the development of the relationship between Raju and Rosie. Raju’s courage and compassion, and the hypocrisy of ‘respectable’ society’s attitude toward ‘public women’ are powerfully portrayed, as is the chemistry between him and Rosie aided by tender, poignant moments and superb dialogues. Here, in another deviation from the novel, Goldie Saab takes great care to show us the inside view off Rosie’s marriage, her neglect by Marco, his nastiness to her and even his whoring to justify her walking out of her marriage and living in with Raju. Whereas in the book, Rosie and Raju get physically attracted to each other and straight off hop into bed behind Marco’s back. But we have to understand that Narayan wrote for a niche English reading audience who accepted this affair more easily but Goldie knew it would be blasphemy and morally shocking for the masses who went to the cinema. And one has to say he got it right. He makes us feel for Rosie and we want her to leave Marco and be with Raju. However, once they get together and Raju makes Rosie a big star, ‘Nalini’, their falling out, at the height of Rosie’s success, is rendered more sketchily — the film implies (in contradiction to its earlier message), that worldly success inevitably corrupts and that career women must indeed construct (in Rosie’s words) ‘a sort of fortress around the heart’.

The film is enhanced richly by the two central performances. Dev Anand gives perhaps his best shaded performance in the title role, playing him perfectly with just the right amount of grey and his nuanced performance won him his second Filmfare Award for Best Actor. Good as Dev Anand is, however, the life and soul of Guide is undoubtedly Waheeda Rehman. It was a daring role to play in those times, of a woman who leaves her stifling impotent husband and lives with her lover, a guide who helps her in her ambitions to become a famous dancer. Waheeda was in fact told she was committing professional suicide taking on this role. However it is to her credit that she was more than able to humanize Rosie to get the viewer’s sympathy. Whether breaking the metamorphic pot of social constraints or dancing precariously over a ledge in keeping with her dangerous new desires, Waheeda Rehman is outstanding in the film with her portrayal of an adulterous, career-minded, strong woman. Never has she looked, acted or danced better! She too won the Filmfare Award for Best Actress for Guide. However, after Guide, Waheeda’s career graph was strange to say the least. Her commercial successes Ram Aur Shyam (1967) and Patthar ke Sanam (1967) hardly challenged her histrionic ability and the films that did so – Teesri Kasam (1966), Khamoshi (1969) and Reshma Aur Shera (1971) bombed at the box-office in spite of some of her best work as an actress. Dev Anand and Waheeda are supported perfectly by the supporting cast, particularly Kishore Sahu and Leela Chitnis.

The other highlight of Guide is its phenomenal musical score by SD Burman. The film represents perhaps Burman Dada’s greatest work and he is aided tremendously by Shailendra’s lyrics and the flawless rendering of the songs by Mohammed Rafi, Lata Mangeshkar, Kishore Kumar and himself. Each and every song be it Aaj Phir Jeene ki Tamanna Hai, Tere Mere Sapne Ab Ek Rang Hai, Din Dhal Jaye, Gaata Rahe Mera Dil, Piya Tose Naina Lage Re, Mujhse Chhal Kiye Ja and Kya Se Kya Ho Gaya (a rare case of two songs back to back), Allah Megh De and Wahan Kaun Hai Tera is perfectly written, composed and sung. It is indeed shocking that Burman Dada lost out on the Filmfare Award to Shankar-Jaikishen for their populist score in Suraj (1966), which great as it was, came nowhere near Guide’s scintillating musical score. Guide also sees Vijay Anand at his peak and more than reinforces his reputation as Indian Cinema’s premier song picturizer. Special mention must be made of Aaj Phir Jeene ki Tamanna Hai (The famous low angle tracking shot of Waheeda dancing along the ledge continues to amaze one even today as does the shot of moving from mirror to mirror) and Tere Mere Sapne which he canned in just 3 shots with complex character and camera movements – truly a great filmmaker at the heights of his craft. The film is brilliantly photographed in Pathe Colour (the English version was filmed in Eastman Colour) by Fali Mistry and processed abroad which has helped the print retain its vibrant colours even today. And special mention must be made of Hiralal’s choreography resulting in some of the most famous dance numbers of Hindi films.

Initially, Guide had a tough time being sold because of its so called bold theme but thanks to Production Controller Yash Johar’s perseverance, the film was finally sold and released to great critical acclaim and was a big commercial success. As the oft repeated statement goes – ” and the rest is history.”

Hindi, Drama, Color

Previous ArticleNext Article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *